Showing posts with label women are awful at sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women are awful at sports. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Making Rupp Proud!

So I am watching the Kentucky vs Flordia game and I noticed something unusual about Kentucky's court. There is only one 3 point line on the court! This is significant because I haven't seen any college courts with only one line. The guys moved theirs back a foot this year but the girls line stayed at the same place, hence the confusion Hummel always has shooting 3's (people from valpo can't figure out those pesky 2 lines).

This made me wonder....where do the UK women play. Better yet who cares. I am extremely sick of women's basketball which has been given an abnormal amount of TV time because of Pat Summit and her 1,000 win. Who cares! I believe Sharpe wrote a blog about this a long time ago, so I won't get into it. But I can't help but think that the women play in a tiny building off campus; just the way Adolf Rupp would have wanted it.

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

I obviously hate women

So this is my second woman bashing post in a row but this one is also 100% correct. Today on First Take they posed the question of whether or not Pat Summit would be able to coach the Tennessee men's program. I stopped scanning my contracts homework because my mind was completely blind sided by the most ridiculous question of all time. Um, Pat Summit wouldn't be able to recruit a single decent player. Not one. Ever. End of story. Does anyone who doesn't shit their pants regularly really think an 18 year old kid would pick Pat Summit over any other men's coach? Skip (note: absolutely retarded) stated a kid may want to experiment with having a woman coach. Wrong. When I was 18 the only experiment I wanted to do involved mixing alcohol and sex[Ed. Note: and dudes]. The only way a woman would be able to recruit is if she was super hot, super slutty, and had won regularly with a men's team somewhere else. This would make an interesting choice for an 18 year old, go to a historical power like UNC or UCLA or get blown every day after practice.

On this same note, what is the deal with mixing men's and women's coaching wins when people talk about records? This is just silly. There are, at most, 4 respectable women's teams on an average year. You suck as a sport if it is an absolute shock when all one seeds don't make it to the final four. Bitches. How hard is it to recruit against the other 6 historically decent women's teams? Don't they just split the ten girls a year who can actually get the ball to the rim from past the three point line? I'm not the biggest Bob Knight fan ever but are you really going to tell me Pat Summit is the better coach? I would consider allowing women's wins if you counted 10% of their wins. This is the absolute most I would accept and I am the official person to talk to in regards to records.

On this same note, if you are going to add women's wins why not add my wins on NCAA March Madness? My teams always go undefeated and I recruit like a crazy person. I guess we are all involved in college basketball so they should count my wins too. I would be the best coach in America under this idea so I'm 100% animals behind it.

I promise my next post won't bash women.*

*I will edit this out if I change my mind.